I bet you've forgotten how good apricot preserves are, haven't you? You might wish to refresh your memory. Yum.
« How To Be Happy Part 4: Train For Something | Main | A Multimedia Extravaganza »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c311353ef00d8344273c153ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Reminder:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Even better: Mango-Ginger Conserve. (Nothing is as good as good raspberry anything, but this comes close. Ginger rocks.)
Posted by: emma goldman | May 03, 2005 at 01:03 PM
Marianne rocks more.
Posted by: CN | May 03, 2005 at 01:20 PM
Except it's "Mary Ann." (I only mention this because it took me a minute to figure out what you were saying. But then I giggled.)
And that brings up a question: Why do so many boys/men like Mary Ann? Because they think they have a chance with her?
Posted by: emma goldman | May 03, 2005 at 02:03 PM
Right. Mary Ann.
No, I don't think it's because they (we) simply think we have a better chance. Ginger's an icon of glamour; Mary Ann's an icon of beauty. That's how this beholder sees it, anyhow.
Posted by: CN | May 03, 2005 at 02:39 PM
Okay, so what's the difference? (Mary Ann an icon of beauty? Huh? I don't think she's all that OR a bag of chips. Neither is Ginger, for that matter, but still.)
Posted by: emma goldman | May 03, 2005 at 03:19 PM
I stole this from a book blurb, but it applies: Beauty is truth. Glamour is what we do about the truth.
(And I stole the beauty/glamour thing from a Fresh Air review of John O'Donohue's Beauty: The Invisible Embrace. It sounds worth reading.)
Mary Ann and Ginger as icons of beauty and glamour? I agree with you: They are not, in an absolute sense. But relative to each other, I think they represent the concepts, as caricatures.
Posted by: CNmpm@midmaine.com | May 03, 2005 at 04:16 PM
I'm mostly feeling slow and stupid, now, for not really getting this. But perhaps I merely have idiosyncratic notions of beauty, truth, and/or glamour, and, especially, don't see how the first two are equated, exactly. Or maybe it's slow and stupid day in my brain.
Posted by: emma goldman | May 04, 2005 at 12:29 PM