This is an uncharacteristic post. I reserve the right to delete it. But here's my take on the whole question of my unsuccessful love life.
1) Thanks for the comments, and for your support.
2) I have heard the "men are intimidated" comment too many times to dismiss it out of hand. Where does this come from if there's no truth to it? Plus I know intelligent men who have confessed to being intimidated by strong women; to wanting a woman who is not challenging. I have heard smart, cool, men describing a mutual friend, and why she's attractive. "She's the least intimidating person I've ever met." There's something about putting people at ease that is a feminine characteristic. There's something about softness and sensitivity and openness that's attractive. I think part of that "you are strong and that scares men" statement is about this softness, the feminine ability to make a safe place where emotion and vulnerability are accepted.
I think I'm actually pretty soft and sensitive and open. You blog readers might see this more easily than others do. You see me walking around and looking at the beautiful things in the world, you see me crying when I hear a song full of heartbreak and yearning. You see all the things I notice and how I respond to the world with emotion. I'm intuitive and I'm learning to trust that side of myself. This is a place where I do that more and more.
I'm not sure this is what the world sees. I don't have conversations where I say, "the moon this morning hung still in the sky and the air was so cold that smoke was rising off the water and the way the ducks hunched together in small groups made me long for the warmth of my kitchen," or those kind of snippets that I put down here regularly. In life, I tend to be saying things like, "Let's go have a drink and play cheesy bar games!" That's a caricature, perhaps, but not so much of one. I am a social organizer and I'm tuned into other people's comfort zones and I entertain and schmooze and sparkle and listen and laugh and in all these ways I'm Rock Star Charisma Barbie. And in professional situations I'm busy asking all kinds of questions and solving problems and making connections and being logical and rational and competitive and curious and engaged. Those two personas are me, they're real. But they're not a complete picture of me. You guys don't see them so much. The rest of the world sees them 95% of the time.
3) It is my habit to hide the sad, lonely, and vulnerable parts of myself. It is true that I am pretty confident, fairly capable, reasonably smart. I'm generally optimistic and cheerful, absorbed and contented with my life. I think it's fair to say that my baseline mood is a pretty high level of happiness. So if people think I'm happy and complete, well, they're mostly right. But the things that worry me and fill me with dread and shame, the places in my emotional life where I feel clumsy and broken and half-formed, the things I'm struggling with, the things I yearn for that I don't know how to find for myself, the places that scare me, the ways I haven't yet learned to be comfortable, the part of me that just wants to be held, well, all that stuff I do not share easily. My own neediness scares me, and because of that I think it will scare others. So I keep it to myself. And what comes across about me is a picture of a happy girl, and all the ways I'm confident and sure of myself and engaged with the world. Those parts are true. But there is more about me than that. I'm a girl who's lonely at times, who feels stunted and broken in ways, who wants encouragement and comfort but doesn't know how to ask for it.
It's why I don't understand how on earth I could seem intimidating. I don't feel intimidating. But I think I might be, in some ways. And the ways I might seem intimidating aren't necessarily ones that make it the man's fault for not responding to me. It's not so much that I think what I project is validly intimidating. But I think there may be men looking for a softness, who don't see it in me even though it is there, and who turn away and look elsewhere.
4) I think my project is to become braver about those ways I don't have things together, rather than trying to barricade them off and project only my strengths. I don't think that's about "catching a man," but rather a larger project, about being more honest and complete in my life. Letting go of the fear of my own unresolved parts. I was worrying about something the other day and thinking that I could use some good advice. And I realized that I never, ever, ever ask for advice about things that really worry me. If you're a friend you might think I am asking you for advice but by the time I get to a place where I can make something public I've usually worked out my own answer and am coming to you for confirmation or a reality check. Unless I'm crying when I talk to you it's probably not raw, or fresh. It's already been worked through. It takes years and years of knowing me before I will cry in front of you. I cry alone.
5) It's true that I don't want a man who would want me "dumbed down." Or who would be threatened by my success or my confidence. ("Success" being entirely theoretical, since I don't know quite what it means, or whether it's in store for me.) I don't want a man who's afraid to ask me out. I want to feel loved and wanted and worth pursuing, like a special prize. All of that suggests that I should wait to be asked out, and then sort from the pool of men who've done that. (And it comports with all of the bestselling pink-covered dating advice books in Barnes & Noble.) But I ask out men from time to time, and I like that about myself. I like being the kind of person who reaches out and who takes emotional risks, who follows my intuition. In every other aspect of my life -- professionally, socially, creatively -- when I reach out to someone and try to make a connection I am rewarded with warmth and gratitude. I believe in reaching out. Except that it means that by doing that I am, by definition, investing some hope in people who haven't already decided I'm worth pursuing. It makes me feel like I'm auditioning, in an arena I feel I've already failed at again and again. It's scary, and it makes me doubly likely to cover up those broken, soft, vulnerable parts, and turn on my high beam personality, dazzle with smarts and confidence and charm.
6) The solution, I guess, is the same. Just try to be braver. Reach out when I feel a connection. Respond when someone reaches out to me. Be myself. All of myself. Which means the broken parts and the sad parts and the soft parts and the little lost girl parts as well as the grown up capable friendly together parts.
Self confidence is intimidating to many people (men and women). I'm not saying that you should walk around feeling insecure. Don't be afraid to show that broken, soft, vulnerable feelings. Isn't that real bravery? Anyway, it helps people understand that you are human and helps them connect with you. It's okay to make mistakes in front of people that don't know you--even emotional mistakes. It's endearing. Anyway, don't change your whole personality--I know what you are saying, I do. Just trying to open you thought process a bit.
Posted by: | February 26, 2005 at 12:00 PM
I'm continually inspired by your level of self-awareness, a journey I only started on around 5 or so years ago (say since my late 20's). Based on some of your prior posts, it would seem you've been very attuned to your self and your place from a fairly early age (as opposed to simly "being"). Do you attribute that level of self-awareness, at least in part, to your long tradition of maintaining a journal? If so, do you have any suggestions or recommended reading for one considering starting a personal journal (not necessarily a blog, mind you)?
BTW, thanks for not deleting the post - I found it very thought-provoking and motivating.
Posted by: mls | February 26, 2005 at 05:24 PM
And "Rock Star Charisma Barbie" wouldn't be intimidating? In a "hard to keep up with" sense?
A hypothetical Ken would have to have some strategy for working with (or coping with) RSCB. Giving her a "too intimidating" blow-off is easier than actually making adjustments in Ken's own plastic head.
(All this recognizing, of course, that RSCB isn't the only one. But she's still there, nyet?)
Posted by: pjm | February 26, 2005 at 09:50 PM
In your previous post, there was a commenter who signed off as "l.", who said a lot that made sense, especially her comment about ravens. I wish I'd written that comment.
Guys don't look too carefully at personality, not at first, anyway.
Posted by: boo | February 26, 2005 at 10:23 PM
I too was inspired by this post. I see myself in many of the ways you describe not wanting to show people those "clumsier half formed" pieces of self. When I was yougner, I took this to the extreme, and suffered some of the physical consequences of barricading all of those less confident/less attractive pieces of myself from anyone else for too long. I'm still not very comfortable with exposing my weaknesses to people, but whenever I do have those moments of braveness and trust the people around me (even those with whom I haven't developed the "crying-in-front- of" level of comfort), they've embraced me every time. I think that you're onto something, and I think that the results of this kind of bravery can be pretty tremendous.
Posted by: Ms. Runner | February 26, 2005 at 11:20 PM
This is such a great post. My only contribution is that everyone likes to have a place where she or he excels, where they are the smartest in the room, where they are the expert. My best friend and her long-term (now-ex) boyfriend are both really smart people but were both law students and ultimately, I think that the lack of differentiation was really hard for them. When the rubber hit the road (read: clerkship applications) the competition really drove a wedge into their relationship. Both of them, I think, would do better with engineers, or artists, or psychologists, or writers--someone smart but whose smartness isn't competitive with their own. I'm a law student and I'm engaged to a graduate student and it's great to be able to say, "I know about law, but you know about economics. Tell me." Maybe when people say, "You're too smart for me. You intimidate me," they also mean, "I need a place where I can be the smartest, and you're so good at everything that when I'm with you, I feel like I'm always playing catch-up." The same logic applies to social life as well--I think it's why introverts often end up with extroverts. They're just not in competition for the same social role. Meanwhile, two extroverts often place similar values on social activities and relationships, which can result in the less-extroverted of the pair feeling self-conscious if s/he is in a less social phase, or less popular, or whatever.
Posted by: supergirl | February 27, 2005 at 09:53 AM
My experience with vulnerability, particularly about the broken/unformed/scary insecurities of our lives is that they are often a turn-on to friends/lovers/intimates. They make people feel closer to you, and you closer to them.
When you share something, you give people the chance to know you, to know what keeps you up at 4AM or makes you sob into your pillow. It's the coolest feeling, to find people that you trust and share with them the parts of life that most scare you, the parts of yourself that you hate or feel insecure about, or that cause you the most pain.
It's sort of like the story you told about the friend you knew who was raped. You can talk around it or ignore it or keep quiet about it, but you end up missing a big part of the picture.
Posted by: Jeebie | February 27, 2005 at 03:26 PM
I agree with 2) completely - I wanted to write the same thing down in your first post, but I wasn't able to get the ideas down properly and I got frustrated at the other posters for not considering something that I thought was obviously true... so I ended up giving up.
But I was in your position once. I tried to soften, to open, to change. In a way that I thought would make my life easier, and more importantly, more worth living. After all, I was just letting a side of me I kept inside get outside a little more.
I hated the results. Things that were once easy got harder and harder, and I just got sadder and angrier. I didn't realise what was going on until quite late. And now, making the slow and painful journey back to what I once was, where despite the pain, I could do what came naturally.
Please just understand that this is not one of those situations when you're going to get something for nothing.
Posted by: | February 27, 2005 at 11:30 PM
You're scary because you're a powerful creature and I don't think most men are used to seeing that kind of personal power in *any* form, let alone the female form.
Plus, you're unbelievably bright and authentic and wonderfully intense and that's scary, especially in a romantic context because people open up more, and show more, and retain a bit more control, than they do with a friend, no matter how close. See above.
You're all the things that a super-together serious guy ought to want. Problem is, even a super-together guy doesn't deserve ya. ;)
Posted by: anthony | March 01, 2005 at 09:12 PM
Wow I was searching for articles on stron, intimidating, powerful women because Guys tell me im intimidating too. When I came across your blog I thought I had written it! You have said exactly what I think and feel and I thank you for having the courage to do so! Rock on!
Posted by: Amanda | March 21, 2005 at 10:01 PM
I realized recently that I fall In Love when someone is vulnerable. It doesn't have to be showing the easily-hurt parts vulnerable; it can be 'totally out there with his feelings for me' vulnerable.
My best friend at school asked for advice on how to behave around his ex-girlfriend in whom he was interested again, and I told him to stop being cool and joking around for 30 seconds, long enough to tell her that he really liked her. It worked, too.
Posted by: PG | June 24, 2005 at 03:36 AM
I found this page after I did a search for "too intimidating", because I have yet again been called too intimidating. It's interesting for me to hear a female perspective on this, as I often get called "too intimidating" and "too smart." During one of my job interviews, one of my references even received a phone call asking "if [he] is real?" and "if [he] is as good as he seems?" An ex-girlfriend (still a close friend) told me that I was "too smart, too worldly, and too intimidating."
I completely empathize with how you hide the vulnerable parts of your life and hide the parts of you that evoke a sense of dread or shame. The projection of confidence scares people...Furthermore, you fundamental engagement in the world is unusual and probably adds to the sense of discomfort of those who are intimidated. Heavin forbid that you should be thinking about your world at more than a superficial level.
Posted by: | January 15, 2008 at 02:06 AM